MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7063182469

A wireless monitoring system to identify wind induced vibrations in HV transmission lines

2021· article· en· W7063182469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVirtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWirelessVibrationElectrical conductorElectric power transmissionDistortion (music)Condition monitoringTransmission (telecommunications)Suspension (topology)Wind powerChannel (broadcasting)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conductors of High Voltage Transmission Lines are affected by wind induced vibrations that can lead to fatigue failures of fittings and conductors themselves. Monitoring of these phenomena is very important in order to avoid the sudden break of an in-service line and to define the predictive maintenance of the system. Vibration recorders actually employed for field monitoring do not assure a suitable time window to cover all the different wind conditions, they allow to measure only the bending amplitude at the suspension clamp and do not offer any real time alert. For these reasons a new Wireless Monitoring System has been developed specifically for this context, taking advantage of new technologies such as wireless communication and energy harvesting that make possible to obtain compact devices, characterized by long autonomy and on board computations, able to measure the free loop vibration amplitude in the desired points of the instrumented span. In the paper, the hardware composing the wireless system is analysed and a deep insight of the algorithms developed for detection of Aeolian vibrations, Subspan Oscillations and Galloping is carried out. The system has been adopted for the first time in a real monitoring field test in Canada: this campaign has allowed to verify the correct functioning of the devices under extreme weather conditions and to obtain many data. It’s showed how this data have been processed in order to obtain useful information regarding the strains to which conductors are subject because of the wind action. In the end a comparison between experimental and numerical data, obtained by means of a suitable software, is carried out in order to validate the full procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207