Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Sucesos Estresantes Extraordinarios en docentes. Provincia Caylloma, Arequipa, Perú / Psychometric analysis of the life stressful events scale in teachers from Caylloma state, Arequipa, Peru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducción: Los sucesos estresantes extraordinarios se consideran eventos de gran relevancia en la vida de las personas por los cambios que acarrean y porque se asocian con diversas patologías físicas y mentales. Objetivo: Analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Sucesos Estresantes Extraordinarios de JF Labrador en profesores de la provincia de Caylloma, ubicada en la región Arequipa, al sur de Perú. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de tipo instrumental con 169 profesores de la provincia de Caylloma (37,3 % varones y 62,7 % mujeres), a quienes se les aplicó la ficha de datos sociodemográficos y la Escala de Sucesos Estresantes Extraordinarios mediante una aplicación de Google forms. Resultados: Se encontró que la prueba cuenta con validez de constructo obtenida mediante el análisis factorial exploratorio, con una estructura bifactorial. Estos factores se denominaron estresores debidos a cambios en el entorno y estresores provocados por problemas en las relaciones interpersonales, que obtuvieron óptimos índices de confiabilidad mediante la prueba Omega de McDonald y la prueba Alfa de Cronbach. Conclusión: Se concluye que la Escala de Sucesos Estresantes Extraordinarios posee adecuados índices de validez y confiabilidad en los profesores de Caylloma, por tanto, se recomienda su uso para evaluar el estrés. Introduction: Extraordinary stressful events are considered events of great relevance in people's lives because of the changes that they bring about and because they are associated with various physical and mental illnesses. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the JF Labrador’s Extraordinary Stress Events scale in professors from the Caylloma Province, located in the Arequipa Region, southern Peru. Methods: An instrumental study was carried out with 169 professors from the Caylloma Province (37.3% were males and 62.7% were females), to whom the sociodemographic data sheet and the Extraordinary Stress Events scale were applied through a Google Forms application. Results: The test was found to have construct validity obtained through exploratory factor analysis, with a bifactor structure. These factors were called stressors due to changes in the environment and stressors caused by problems in interpersonal relationships, which obtained optimal reliability indexes by means of the McDonald's omega and the Cronbach's alpha tests. Conclusion: The Extraordinary Stress Events scale has been concluded to have adequate validity and reliability indexes in Caylloma teachers; therefore, its use is recommended to evaluate stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".