Applied Mindfulness for Physicians: A Prospective Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Physician burnout is increasingly recognized as having adverse impacts on the wellbeing of individual physicians, and by extension the healthcare delivery systems of which they are part. Amidst growing evidence showing increased physician burnout, mindfulness has been recommended as one potential approach for addressing physician burnout and enhancing physician wellbeing. Few empirical studies have been published on Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) adapted for physicians, and none based on the foundational teachings of internationally renowned scholar, Zen Master and Noble Peace Prize Nominee Thích Nhất Hạnh. Moreover, the majority of these studies have been quantitative, leaving a gap in understanding the lived experience and practical application of mindfulness in the context of physicians’ daily lives. Methods: Through a prospective qualitative study, forty-five physicians participated in a five-week Applied Mindfulness Program for Medical Personnel (AMP-MP) on-site at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. The program content, based on the teachings of Thích Nhất Hạnh, was tailored to meet the interests and needs specific to the population of physicians. To inform this innovative and novel approach, an iterative reciprocal relationship was established with Thích Nhất Hạnh’s international Plum Village community. Following participation in AMP-MP, semi-structured interviews were completed with twenty-eight program participants. Interviews were transcribed and then analyzed using thematic analysis. To develop rigorous high-quality qualitative research, the study was theoretically grounded in the interpretive paradigm and utilized the middle range theory the Mechanisms of Mindfulness for analysis and interpretation. Results: Based on participants’ accounts, a thematic map was developed that illustrates a learning pathway for developing mindfulness in five phases: 1) Initial intention; 2) Establishing a mindful environment; 3) Development and application of practices concepts; 4) Broadening the conceptualization of mindfulness; and 5) Mindfulness becomes “a way of life”. The data indicates that participants developed a foundational competency in Applied Mindfulness that benefitted their personal sense of wellbeing, along with enhancing their interactions with their patients, colleagues and administrators. While these findings are encouraging, further research is needed to identify necessary systems-level changes to support broader implementation and long-term maintenance of mindfulness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".