MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064016660

Assessing the impact of oilfield development on native grassland ecosystems with remote sensing

2023· dissertation· en· W7064016660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrasslandVegetation (pathology)EcosystemGrassland ecosystemEcoregionThreatened speciesFragmentation (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The native grassland ecosystems in the Canadian prairies, which have been reduced to remnants, continue to be threatened partially as a result of human activities such as agriculture and a significant increase in oilfields from oil exploration and production. The development of oilfields on grasslands often leads to the fragmentation and conversion of native grassland vegetation into oilfields. This is still an increasing trend with newly established oilfields and some of them becoming inactive. The total area occupied by the oilfield is relatively small, but the fragmentation and the effects on vegetation and soil at local and landscape levels for the ecosystem can be significant but are not fully understood. The research focused on understanding the effects of oilfields on native grassland ecosystems with remote sensing techniques, using Monet pasture in the mixed-grass ecoregion of Saskatchewan as the study site. Furthermore, the oilfields were identified and extracted from remotely sensed data using object- and pixel-based image analysis procedures. The spatio-temporal changes of oilfield disturbances in grasslands (over a period of 6 years) were also evaluated, and the local effects of oilfields in grassland were investigated using spectral vegetation indices derived from satellite images to assess vegetation and bare soil changes. The results indicated that a total of 48, 68, and 76 oilfields (distributed within 8 categories: abandoned, active, cased, completed, planned, preset, suspended, and uncategorized) were identified and extracted for the periods of 2016, 2019, and 2022, respectively, in the study area. Out of all the categories, the active oil well was sufficiently extracted. The area covered by the linear and non-linear oilfields increased by 101.6% and 119.1%, respectively (2016–2022). The grassland vegetation cover and water content at varying distances further away from the active oilfields increased and decreased in the study area; variations were observed at different distances (5–50 metres and 10–200 metres) further away from the active oil well and oil road in the years considered. This study will enhance the sustainable management of grasslands. It will also help researchers and grassland managers understand how to effectively identify and monitor oilfield disturbances in grassland ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207