MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7064017898

ADVANCED MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH STRENGTH LOW ALLOY STEELS

2023· dissertation· en· W7064017898 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsMicrostructurePrecipitationNucleationHigh-strength low-alloy steelBainiteMisorientationAlloySofteningMicroalloyed steel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fine/nanoscale carbonitrides of microalloying elements such as Nb, Ti, and V play a significant role in the strengthening of HSLA steels. Site-specific analysis of the precipitates in different heterogeneous microstructural areas within realistic alloys is limited and the competition of different precipitates has not been discussed in detail. In this work, the relationship of precipitates/clusters with microstructure has been analyzed by site-specific methods and a simple model has been created to describe the competition between strain-induced precipitation and (Ti, Nb) (C, N). Firstly, the spatial distribution of precipitates and microstructure heterogeneity in an X70 steel were investigated by site-specific analysis method. The quantitative analyze the precipitates reveals that strain-induced precipitation of fine NbC particles (5-20 nm) on dislocations was suppressed by the large (Ti, Nb) (C, N) precipitates. The similarity of precipitates in each location suggests that the local features (such as strain and grain size) in the final microstructure arise from phase transformations during cooling. Secondly, the microstructural evolution during coiling and its effects on the mechanical properties of a vanadium microalloyed steel were investigated. Experimental findings showed that during holding at 500 ºC, nano precipitates (<10 nm) containing V and N nucleated heterogeneously, primarily in areas with high Kernel Average Misorientation (KAM) values. These areas contained a larger number of dislocations, which acted as nucleation sites for the precipitates. The effect of precipitation strengthening was not significant and was offset by softening caused by the aging of bainite and associated recovery of dislocations. Thirdly, in the HSLA steel with both V and Nb additions, nano precipitates were found to preferentially form around dislocations and grain/sub-grain boundaries in high KAM areas associated with bainite. Precipitates were frequently observed around cementite in low KAM areas, which were identified as granular bainite. Interphase clusters were also discovered in low KAM areas behind the ferrite/austenite interface. Analysis of the results indicated that the precipitation of micro-alloyed particles on cementite may reduce the contribution of precipitation hardening achievable through microalloying. Finally, a competition model between strain-induced precipitates (SIP) and epitaxial growth in micro-alloyed austenite has been developed. Using this model, it is possible to estimate the effects of process parameters (T, applied strain), the number density of pre-existing TiN particles, and steel composition on the precipitation process. Through the various studies achieved here, the aim to understand the relationship between the precipitates and different microstructures and develop the competition models has been accomplished. These works provide a relatively new workflow to investigate the precipitates within the steel, especially in site-specific areas, and also allow us to predict the precipitation of NbC by selecting desired temperature range, applied strain, and number density of pre-existing TiN precipitates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→