MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064027796

Analysis of Ice Hockey Player Production and Team Location

2014· article· en· W7064027796 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaDiafiltrationLiquationEmperipolesisTriacetinDurvalumab
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHAPTER ONE regional production changes over time.All players who competed on teams in the top professional leagues of North America (the AHL, CHL, ECHL, IHL and NHL) are included in the analysis.Because previous studies covered only one year, they often included college and high school level players in analysis.Since the current study examines four individual years, only professional players are used to keep the amount of data manageable.A few important limitations must be discussed before any analysis is attempted.As with many studies that use hometown information, it must be noted that some discrepancies may exist.Methods for collecting roster information are not always consistent over time or between different leagues.In some occasions players are listed by birthplace as opposed to hometown and this can produce some irregularities.Recreational hockey participation numbers were desired to help explain variations in production in this analysis; however, the author could not acquire this information.Though attempts were made to contact USA Hockey, the governing body of organized leagues throughout the country, no response was received and no organized published reports could be located. Organization of the StudyPrevious studies of hockey in 1974 and 1988 created 'snapshots' of hockey production during the time of their respective studies.They -National organizations had been formed across Canada in the late-19 th century to facilitate competition between amateur teams.The prize trophy of hockey, the Stanley Cup, was donated in 1893 and was awarded to the premiere Canadian amateur team at the end of each season (Pollak, 1998).After the tum of the century, professional hockey organizations began operations, the first of which was the International Hockey League, which began in 1904 with teams in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ontario (Pollak, 1998).Though many in Canada resented the idea of professional hockey players competing for the prized Cup, by 1907 the Eastern Canada Hockey Association, a Stanley Cup qualifying league, began allowing professional skaters on its teams. Subsequent leagues followed, including the Ontario Professional HockeyLeague (the first fully professional league), the Pacific Coast Hockey League and the National Hockey Association (Pollak, 1998).The geographic extent of these leagues shows the distinct regional aspect of the early game.With the exception of the International and Pacific Coast Hockey Leagues, with teams in Pennsylvania and Michigan, and Washington and Oregon, respectively, the early professional leagues were exclusively Canadian.Decades of amateur play at all levels of Canadian society had created an extraordinary amount of hockey talent for these leagues.Even as teams moved to adjacent areas of the United States, they were largely filled with Canadian born players (Alexander, 1999).II ' l"""" '1 '.',""".00 V'l '"'T I

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207