The Biodiversity Coalition Newsletter (No.12, February 1996)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Biodiversity Coalition Newsletter (No.12, February 1996) An International NGO Network for Biodiversity Conservation (C/- P.O., Cygnet 7112, Tasmania, Australia; ph/fax: +61-02-951745) Code Number: NL96002 Size of Files: Text: 62.6K No associated graphics files Forests: Now is the Time to Make a Contribution - Will the Brazilians Come to the Rescue? Underlying Causes of Forest Loss Trade & Environment - the Game to Watch & Play Pressure is on the Brazilians to be the 'Good Guys' Germany drops Support for Forests Convention 1996 Schedule of Meetings on Forests Quote of the Week "The objectives of forest science must be to optimise the extent of forest not to maximise it" GEF - Review Time! Meetings - More Meetings Provisional List of Meetings for 1996 Organised by the CBD Secretariat or which they are Expected to Attend: Trade & Environment- US Laws 'Bite' CBD-Ramsar Convention MoU WELCOME TO SOUTH AFRICA YOU ARE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE The CBD's new Executive Secretary, Calestous Juma, has written to all participants (governmental and nongovernmental) encouraging our participation in the ongoing work of the Secretariat in implementing the decisions of the COP Note that the CBD Secretariat has now moved to Montreal and their new contacts are: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre, Office 630 413 St. Jacques Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y IN9 ph: +1-514-288.2220 fax: +1-514-288.6588 COP MEDIUM TERM WORK PROGRAMME: 1996- 97 FAO'S TRUE COLOURS REVEALED - a wolf in sheep's clothing Fisheries Forests Genetic Resources - CPGR expands its agenda into in-situ conservation FAO Threatens Argentina RULES OF PROCEDURE NGO'S PREPARE FOR FAO'S LEIPZIG CONFERENCE BIOSAFETY AGENDA TAKES A FORWARD STEP Industry Lobbying Technology Transfer and Benefit Sharing WELCOME TO SINGAPORE RATIFICATION PROGRESS 138 countries have now ratified the Convention, as of 4 January 1996. Pronunciamento de las ONGs de America Latina
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.584 | 0.390 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".