The Biodiversity Coalition Newsletter (No.12, February 1996)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Biodiversity Coalition Newsletter (No.12, February 1996) An\nInternational NGO Network for Biodiversity Conservation (C/- P.O.,\nCygnet 7112, Tasmania, Australia; ph/fax: +61-02-951745) Code Number:\nNL96002 Size of Files: Text: 62.6K No associated graphics files\nForests: Now is the Time to Make a Contribution - Will the Brazilians\nCome to the Rescue? Underlying Causes of Forest Loss Trade &\nEnvironment - the Game to Watch & Play Pressure is on the\nBrazilians to be the 'Good Guys' Germany drops Support for Forests\nConvention 1996 Schedule of Meetings on Forests Quote of the Week "The\nobjectives of forest science must be to optimise the extent of forest\nnot to maximise it" GEF - Review Time! Meetings - More Meetings\nProvisional List of Meetings for 1996 Organised by the CBD Secretariat\nor which they are Expected to Attend: Trade & Environment- US Laws\n'Bite' CBD-Ramsar Convention MoU WELCOME TO SOUTH AFRICA YOU ARE\nINVITED TO PARTICIPATE The CBD's new Executive Secretary, Calestous\nJuma, has written to all participants (governmental and\nnongovernmental) encouraging our participation in the ongoing work of\nthe Secretariat in implementing the decisions of the COP Note that the\nCBD Secretariat has now moved to Montreal and their new contacts are:\nSecretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade\nCentre, Office 630 413 St. Jacques Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y\nIN9 ph: +1-514-288.2220 fax: +1-514-288.6588 COP MEDIUM TERM WORK\nPROGRAMME: 1996- 97 FAO'S TRUE COLOURS REVEALED - a wolf in sheep's\nclothing Fisheries Forests Genetic Resources - CPGR expands its agenda\ninto in-situ conservation FAO Threatens Argentina RULES OF PROCEDURE\nNGO'S PREPARE FOR FAO'S LEIPZIG CONFERENCE BIOSAFETY AGENDA TAKES A\nFORWARD STEP Industry Lobbying Technology Transfer and Benefit Sharing\nWELCOME TO SINGAPORE RATIFICATION PROGRESS 138 countries have now\nratified the Convention, as of 4 January 1996. Pronunciamento de las\nONGs de America Latina
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".