MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064301092

Assessment of hemp meal as a protein supplement for non-lactating dairy cows

2022· dissertation· en· W7064301092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin squareDry matterMealRumenRuminantFecesSoybean mealNeutral Detergent FiberFish mealBlood meal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemp meal (HM) may be a suitable protein supplement for dairy cows, but its use as a ruminant feed has not yet been approved in Canada. To obtain information regarding the potential to utilize hemp meal as a cattle feed, dry matter intake (DMI), rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, total tract digestibility, and concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in blood plasma, urine, muscle, and adipose tissues were compared between non-lactating dairy cows receiving either HM or canola meal (CM), or a combination of HM and CM. Six non-lactating, non-pregnant Holstein cows were used in a repeated 3 × 3 Latin Square design feed trial with three, 3-week experimental periods. The first two weeks served as an adaptation (washout) period, and sample collection occurred during the third week of each period. Cows were fed a basal, partially mixed ration (PMR) diet that was supplemented with either 10.2 % DM HM, 13.5 % DM CM or 6.25 % DM HM and 6.16 % DM CM (HC). All diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Total tract digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were determined using acid insoluble ash contents of diets and feces as an internal marker. Supplement treatment did not affect DMI, pH, VFA, ammonia concentrations in the rumen, total tract DM digestibility, crude protein digestibility, urine nitrogen or blood serum concentration of glucose, urea, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and non-esterified fatty acids. However, the total tract NDF digestibility of the CM diet (43 %) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of HM (38 %). No cannabinoids were detected in blood plasma, rumen fluid, kidney, liver, urine, muscle, and adipose tissues of cows. However, CBD and CBDA were detected in the feces of the cows (0.68 ug/g and 0.67 ug/g, respectively). Our data show that hemp meal may be a good and safe alternative to canola meal as a protein supplement for non-lactating dairy cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207