Aspectos sobre el depósito legal de publicaciones españolas de Bellas Artes andaluzas (1987-1996).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparative study was carried out after locating documents produced between 1987 and 1996 in the eight provinces of Andalusia and in the rest of Spain. The documents refer to the area of Andalusia. Their subject-matter is that of the Fine Arts. The present study compares works localised and deposited in the National Library and in the Library of Andalusia and distinguishes among works by reference to year of publication, subject-matter, documental typology and place of publication. This comparison and quantification of the data also makes it possible to evaluate several aspects regarding the observance of the Legal Deposit in Andalusia. The latter is compared with the National Legal Deposit and a number of observations and conclusions are made. Después de localizar los documentos producidos en las ocho provincias andaluzas y en el resto de España, desde 1987 a 1996, que tienen por contenido las Bellas Artes y que hacen referencia a Andalucía, se realiza un estudio comparativo entre las obras localizadas y depositadas en la Biblioteca Nacional y la Biblioteca de Andalucía, distinguiendo las obras publicadas en cada año, las diferentes materias, las tipologías documentales y los lugares de publicación. Esta comparación y cuantificación de los datos permite también comprobar algunos aspectos relacionados con el cumplimiento del Depósito Legal en Andalucía. Éste se compara con el nacional y se aportan una serie de reflexiones y conclusiones al respecto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".