MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064509782

Cambrian-Middle Ordovician Platform-Slope Stratigraphy, Palaeontology and Geochemistry of Western Newfoundland

2017· book· en· W7064509782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · 2017
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeninsulaNational parkArcticBorealOrdovicianThe arcticChronologyShore
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newfoundland and Labrador is located on the eastern edge of North America (Figure 1). The \nisland of Newfoundland, known to it’s friends as “The Rock”, lies off the east coast of the North \nAmerican mainland, and is the most populous part of the Canadian province of Newfoundland \nand Labrador. The island is only 29% of the total province's land area (111,390 km2), but is still \ncomparable to the size of the three maritime provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and \nPrince Edward Island combined. \nThe island is separated from Labrador by the Strait of Belle Isle and the Gulf of St. \nLawrence. Newfoundland's nearest neighbour is the French colony of Saint-Pierre and \nMiquelon, which lies opposite the GSSP for the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary at Fortune on the \nBurin Peninsula (where one of the post-conference field excursions associated with ISECT 2017 \nwill go). \nThough Newfoundland and Labrador is larger than some countries, it has a small population \nof 510,000, around half of whom live in the greater St. John's area. The Communities of Rocky \nHarbour and Norris Point are enclaves within Gros Morne National Park, and form a rich local \nscientific and artistic hub on the west coast of Newfoundland. Many of the localities we visit \nwill be within Gros Morne National Park (a UNESCO World Heritage Site). Collecting and \nhammering is not permitted at these localities. Your guides will be explicit about when you are \nwithin Gros Morne National Park.The terrain of Newfoundland and Labrador varies from arctic tundra, ancient mountain \nranges, lush boreal forest to rugged coastline. \nIn Gros Morne National Park you will see the direct evidence for plate tectonics, and get a \nchance to step on rocks from the earth's mantle. The presence of the ophiolite is one of the reasons for Gros Morne National Park’s existence, as it was the first place that field evidence for \nplate tectonics was demonstrated. \nOn the east coast of Newfoundland, where many of us will go for the formal meetings of the \nEdiacaran and Cambrian commissions, there are other sites of enormous scientific importance. \nThe spectacularly preserved Ediacaran fossils found at Mistaken Point provide important \nevidence for the earliest evolution of macroscopic animal life. The importance of those fossils to \nthe understanding of animal evolution has very recently led to the site being designated as the \nprovince of Newfoundland and Labrador’s second UNESCO world heritage site (in 2016). \nGeological Setting \nNewfoundland is the most north-easterly part of the Appalachian Orogen in North America. \nThe rocks of the Appalachian Orogeny extend along the whole eastern margin of Laurentia. The \nAppalachian fold-belt is subdivided into three lithotectonic subdivisions (Hibbard et al. 2006, \n2007) named the Laurentian, Iapetan, and the peri-Gondwana realms. The three realms can be \ntraced throughout the entire orogen, extending from Newfoundland in the northwest to Alabama, \nUSA in the south (Figure 2). \nThe Laurentian realm comprises the sedimentary rocks that deposited either on or adjacent to \nancient North

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207