“Changing the World One Song at a Time”: Interrogating Constructions of Community in <em>Common Thread Community Chorus of Toronto</em>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Community choirs enact notions of community often based on the assumption that community singing bridges and celebrates cultural diversity through shared musical experiences. What makes Common Thread Community Chorus of Toronto unique among community choirs in Toronto is an explicitly political focus to its musical community-building efforts. This paper explores how the construction of community within Common Thread is predicated on the notion of cultural inclusion through musical, social, and political dimensions. Drawing from research conducted with the choir in 2010 that explored the social and musical experiences of choir members, I argue that the relationships between choral members’ socio-musical experiences and the choir’s construction of community are predicated on particular notions of multiculturalism and inclusion based on a partially visible White normative centre. I will first interrogate how community is constructed within the choir through a complex system of multicultural/multilingual repertoires, musical practices, and sociocultural accessibility measures. The second part of the presentation will focus on Common Thread’s construction of community situated within larger local and global activities and discourses of social justice. Drawing from political theory and adult education theory, I explore Common Thread’s construction of community through the problematic field of identity-differences. The concept of identity-differences locates individual and communal constructions of self in relation to others as complex composites of intersecting power relations. Identity-differences are collective and relational, which often (although not inevitably) insinuate the construction of otherness into its logic. This research raises significant questions for consideration in the development of choral rehearsal and performance practices and structures that seek to diversify membership through bridging differences within and beyond singing communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".