Compilation and Validation of a Therapeutic Intervention Package based on the Healthy Human Theory for Mothers having Children with Autism Spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This research was conducted with the aim of developing and validating a therapeutic intervention package based on the healthy human theory on social stigma, alexithymia, self-compassion, and cognitive fusion of mothers having children with autism spectrum. Materials and Methods: In this research, a mixed research method was used: in the qualitative part, the comparative theme analysis method, and in the quantitative part, the semi-experimental method. The research environment included 52 reliable sources that were selected by purposive sampling based on the healthy human theory and parents of autistic children. The target population in the quantitative section was mothers with autistic children in Isfahan city, 6 of whom were selected by purposive sampling method and participated in the intervention. The tools for collecting data in the quantitative part were the Mak and Kwok Stigma Questionnaire (2010), Toronto Ataxia Scale (TAS-20), Neff's Self-Compassion Questionnaire (2003), and Gillanders et al.'s Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (2014). Results: The results of Atride Sterling's theme analysis indicated that 8 organizing themes (satisfaction and enjoyment of life, loving creation and self, metacognition, peace, happiness, hope, currentness, and meaning) were obtained out of 18 basic themes around the overarching theme, a therapeutic intervention based on the healthy human theory. The results of the dependent t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the pre-test and the post-test in all four social stigma, emotional malaise, self-compassion, and cognitive fusion (P<0.05), which shows the effectiveness and validity of the therapeutic intervention package based on the healthy human theory on mothers with children having the autism spectrum in the preliminary implementation (pilot stage). Conclusion: The therapeutic intervention model based on the healthy human theory is effective on four variables: social stigma, alexithymia, self-compassion, and cognitive fusion. This method can be adopted to conduct counseling interventions for parents to facilitate adaptation to a similar situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".