Bringing Together the United Nations <i>Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples</i> in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) with regards to the situation of Indigenous persons with disabilities living in Canada. In particular, it considers how the obligations and responsibilities identified under the UNDRIP and the CRPD can be interpreted and realized in a manner that is complementary and may amplify the likelihood of the goals of each instrument being realized. An explicit goal is avoiding the exclusions and erasures which arise when single identity politics dominate, which can lead to conflating, ignoring or an inability to engage intra-group differences. The article delves into the challenges and opportunities of reading these instruments together, and examines Canada’s commitments and actions toward implementing both of these instruments in dialogue with Indigenous governments and representative Indigenous disability organizations. Cet article explore la relation entre la Convention Relative aux Droits des Personnes Handicapées des Nations Unies (CRPD) et la Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les Droits des Peuples Autochtones (UNDRIP) en ce qui concerne la situation des personnes Autochtones handicapées vivant dans Canada. En particulier, il examine comment les obligations et responsabilités identifiées dans le cadre de la UNDRIP et de la CRPD peuvent être interprétées et mises en oeuvre de manière complémentaire et amplificatrice. Un objectif explicite est d’éviter les exclusions et les effacements qui surviennent lorsque les politiques identitaires uniques dominent, ce qui peut conduire à un amalgame, à une ignorance ou à une incapacité à prendre en compte les différences intra-groupe. L’article approfondit les défis et les opportunités liés à la lecture conjointe de ces instruments et examine de près les engagements et les actions du Canada pour mettre en oeuvre ces deux instruments dans le cadre d’un dialogue avec les gouvernements Autochtones et les organisations Autochtones représentatives des personnes handicapées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".