MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064697225

The Capacity of Shared Stories to Function as Myth and Encourage Inclusive Participation

2023· article· en· W7064697225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyPoliticsDialogicCommissionAllianceActive listeningExcellence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beginning with a description of the way the myths of incarnation and trinity function to encourage collaborative social participation in the experience of the Morecambe Bay Poverty Truth Commission (http://www.morecambebaypovertytruthcommission.org.uk/), the paper will attempt to show that shared stories operate as myths that transform corporate behaviour. In Timothy Stacey’s words they "help people expand their imagination, overcome the instrumental lens through which they perceive their own lives, and revivify the spirit of political participation." The paper will draw in particular on Stacey, Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2022); Julie Tomlin “The Spiralling Dance of Wisdom” in The Kenarchy Journal 1.3, 2020 (https://kenarchy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Kenarchy_Volume1.3.pdf) and Sue Mitchell and Francisco Jose Eiroa-Orosa, “Love your enemy? An aesthetic discourse analysis of self-transcendence in values-motivated altruism” in Roger Haydon Mitchell, ed. Cultivating New Post–Secular Political Space (London and New York: Routledge, 2019). Stacey’s applied research findings from his years researching among participants in the Metro Vancouver Alliance (https://www.metvanalliance.org.), Tomlin’s work on the instatement of feminine myths and Sue Mitchell’s iteration of the skills of dialogic listening are harnessed to substantiate the proposal that a greater recognition of the role of myth in contemporary society will encourage and facilitate genuine participation. The capacity of shared stories to offset the Western liberal tendency to see knowledge as a rational mathēsis by means of which experts induct the individual into a more or less passive role will be indicated. In conclusion some of the practical outcomes of Round One of the Morecambe Bay Poverty Truth Commission will be outlined in evidence of the socially transformative potential of shared story telling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.091
Scholarly communication0.0290.042
Open science0.0050.047
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)Same topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207