<i>Citizenship Education and Global Migration: Implications for Theory, Research, and Teaching.</i> James A. Banks, ed. Washington, DC: The American Educational Research Association (AERA), 2017, 528 pp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migration is a worldwide phenomenon, which is only increasing. The growing population diversity in many nation-states has escalated the need for inclusion among minoritized populations. Distinguished scholar of diversity and multicultural education James A. Banks compiled a book examining how global migration is initiating a reconsideration and reconceptualization of citizenship education by educators. This volume emerged out of the Global Migration, Structural Inclusion, and Citizenship Education Across Nations conference in 2015, which focused on bringing together scholars across multiple fields connected to multicultural education and citizenship to discuss the impact of global migration. The book’s main premise is that, regardless of political systems, nation-states and schools need to address the ensuing issues and worldviews that arise from diverse populations. Bringing together insights from many recognized scholars in the fields of multicultural and citizenship education, this edited volume includes twenty chapters. The chapters are divided into seven sections of country-based case studies that are grouped together by similar political systems, culture, and migrant histories. Case studies include countries and regions such as Brazil, Canada, China, England, France, Germany, Mexico, the Middle East, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, and the United States. Section 1 provides a comprehensive overview that effectively sets the foundation for readers to explore the topic of citizenship education programming across various nation-states through-out the five subsequent sections. This is followed by a discussion on the implications of theory and research for teaching in the concluding section. Each portion of the book focuses on the challenges of attaining full citizenship rights and societal involvement for minoritized, marginalized, and migrant populations as well as how educators are working toward civic education programs in order to cultivate a sense of inclusion among these groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".