MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7064784872

Culture and Family Relationships: Examining Young Sibling Conflict, and European and South Asian Canadian Mothers

2021· dissertation· W7064784872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationSiblingContext (archaeology)Cross-cultural studiesAssociation (psychology)DyadCross-culturalConstructiveObservational study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mothers are salient influencers of their children’s development, and the strength of their influence is contingent on cultural values and beliefs. Cross-cultural research has primarily investigated parental relationships and their associations with individual child behaviour. The unique contribution of this thesis is the cross-cultural examination of three dyadic relationships in the family: the sibling, parent-child, and marital relationships. Data was drawn from Kids, Family Places. Two hundred and seventy-three Canadian families (222 European and 51 South Asian) were included. There was data from a total of 546 siblings (i.e., 273 dyads). Observational measures of interaction between young sibling dyads were collected in the home, and mothers reported on negative and positive qualities of their parenting, and conflict in their marriage. Cross-culturally equivalent measures of parenting and marital conflict were first established using structural equation modelling. Establishing measurement equivalence was an important component as it allowed for meaningful mean comparisons of the constructs between European and South Asian Canadian mothers. Mean differences were examined with t-tests and there was evidence of cultural variation in parenting and marital conflict patterns. South Asian Canadian mothers reported more negativity with both of their children and positivity with their younger 18-month-old, and lower frequency of destructive marital conflict, than European Canadian mothers. Sibling conflict (aggression and hostility) was investigated in the context of positive parenting and constructive marital conflict, their interaction, and culture. Culture was examined as a moderator on the association of sibling conflict with positive parenting and constructive marital conflict using multilevel modelling. As expected, sibling conflict was found to be negatively predicted by positive parenting. This association was attenuated by the frequency of constructive marital conflict. Consistent with literature, culture moderated the negative association of positive parenting on sibling conflict. Specifically, positive parenting was more strongly associated with sibling conflict in European Canadian than in South Asian families. These findings are discussed in the context of values and beliefs associated with conflict and cooperation amongst individualistic Western cultures and collectivistic Eastern cultures such as the South Asian community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→