Completion Delay Minimization for Instantly Decodable Network Coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Instantly Decodable Network Coding (IDNC) is a subclass of opportunistic network coding that has numerous desirable properties for a wide spectrum of applications, namely its faster decoding delay, simpler coding and decoding processes, and no decoding buffer requirements. Nonetheless, IDNC suffers from two main problems that may limit its attractiveness, as an implementable solution in future wireless networks, against full network coding (FNC), widely studied in the literature. First, it cannot guarantee the decoding of a new packet at each receiver in each transmission, which may severely affect its completion delay. Second, it requires full feedback in order to operate properly, which may be prohibitive for several practical network settings.\n\n\nIn this thesis, we aim to reduce the effect of these drawbacks by studying the problems of minimizing the IDNC completion delay in full and limited feedback scenarios. Since completion delay cannot be optimized only through local decisions in each of the transmissions, we first study the evolution of the IDNC coding opportunities and determine the strategies maximizing them, not only for one transmission, but for all future transmissions. We then formulate the completion delay problem as a stochastic shortest path (SSP) problem, which turns out to be of extremely large dimensions that makes its optimal solution intractable. Nonetheless, we exploit the structure of this SSP and the evolution of the coding opportunities to design efficient algorithms, which outperform FNC in most multicast scenarios and achieve a near-optimal performance in broadcast scenarios. However, since FNC still outperforms IDNC in some network scenarios, we design an adaptive selection algorithm that efficiently selects, between these two schemes, the one that achieves the smaller completion delay.\n\nTo study the effect of feedback reduction, we formulate the completion delay minimization problem, for the cases of intermittent and lossy feedback, as extended SSP and partially observable SSP problems, respectively. We show that these new formulations have the same structure of the original SSP. We thus extend the designed algorithms to operate in intermittent and lossy feedback scenarios, after taking update decisions on the attempted and un-acknowledged packets. These redesigned algorithms are shown to achieve tolerable degradation for relatively low feedback frequencies and high feedback loss rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".