MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064845709

Determinación de mercurio y cadmio en sedimentos de la laguna Umayo en el distrito de Atuncolla Puno – 2018

2024· dissertation· es· W7064845709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)River valleyFresh water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente investigación consistió en la determinación de los niveles de concentración de metales pesados de mercurio (Hg) y cadmio (Cd) en los sedimentos de la laguna Umayo en el distrito de Atuncolla de la Región de Puno 2018, los objetivos específicos planteados fueron determinar la presencia de mercurio (Hg) y cadmio (Cd) en los sedimentos de la laguna Umayo en el distrito de Atuncolla Provincia de Puno - 2018. La metodología consistió en la toma de muestras de los sedimentos en diferentes puntos de muestreo, seleccionados al azar de acuerdo al área y accesibilidad a la laguna Umayo. Las conclusiones a las que se llegaron fueron que se determinó la presencia de mercurio (Hg) con un promedio de 2,56 mg/kg, observándose en el punto de monitoreo 1 de la muestra 3, se encuentra la mayor concentración siendo esta 15,07 mg/kg y al comparar con la norma se observa que estos sobrepasan significativamente en valor establecido, por la normativa Canadian que establece el valor de 0,02 mg/kg; de igual forma se determina que existe presencia de niveles de cadmio (Cd) con un promedio de 5,61 mg/kg., observándose que en el punto de muestra 2 se encuentra la mayor concentración siendo esta de 9.72 mg/kg. Contrastando los valores obtenidos se observa que estos sobrepasan significativamente en valor establecido por la normativa Canadian establece que el valor de 0,03 mg/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207