MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064855322

A BRIEF MINDFULNESS EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS

2020· dissertation· en· W7064855322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessIntervention (counseling)EmpathyMediationSocial anxietySocial workScale (ratio)AnxietyEmpathic concernSocial skillsWorkbook
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mindfulness has recently been a notably hot topic for social work discipline. Many social work academics are increasingly considering integrating these programs into the social work curriculum; however, many see such programs time-consuming and difficult to integrate into social work crowded curriculum, consequently proposing shorter versions. This doctoral thesis aimed to design a brief mindfulness-based education program for social work students and to examine its effectiveness. The study used a quantitative approach, with a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test study design, to examine the program's effectiveness in two separate modules of traditional classroom-based and online programs. The study's participants were 101 third-year undergraduate social work students studying at Hacettepe University. Thirty-two and 27 students respectively comprised the intervention and waitlist control groups of the traditional classroom-based mindfulness module, and 23 and 19 students the online module. A personal questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), Ruminative Thought Style Scale (RTS), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), and The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) were utilized on the intervention and waitlist control groups before and after the intervention. The Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was applied to examine whether the intervention groups reported better results on each variable regarding the measures, after the brief mindfulness intervention. Moreover, multiple mediation analyses were utilized to find out about the possible working mechanisms of the intervention. The results indicated that the brief mindfulness program, in both modules similarly, could make statistically significant improvements in the students' psychological health; however, not in their therapeutic relationship. Mediation analyses showed that adjusting trait mindfulness, rumination, and self-compassion were the possible working mechanisms of the program. Therefore, this brief mindfulness program can be used as an effective and introductory mindfulness program for undergraduate social work students in either classroom-based or online modules; nevertheless, more research is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it