Clinical and objective gait outcomes remained stable seven years after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective longitudinal study of 28 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><b>Background</b>: There is a paucity of data on mid to long-term gait outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. The aims of this longitudinal study were: to assess the evolution of both clinical and gait outcomes before and up to seven years after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a cohort of patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p>\n<p><b>Methods</b>: This study included 28 patients evaluated before and up to seven years after primary TKA with both gait analysis and patient reported outcomes; of these, 20 patients were evaluated one year after surgery as well. Kinematic outcomes during gait (gait velocity, dimensionless gait veolicity, maximal knee flexion and knee range of motion), pain relief, Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), quality of life and patient satisfaction were assessed and compared at each visit with the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test (p &lt; 0.05).</p>\n<p><b>Results</b>: The significant improvement achieved at one year after TKA was stable up to seven years after surgery, with all clinical and kinematic outcomes unchanged, except for gait velocity, with a significant decrease over time (1.3 (1.1-1.4) m/s one year after TKA versus 1.0 (0.9-1.1) m/s, p &lt; 0.05 up to seven years after).</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion</b>: Patients with knee osteoarthritis significantly improve their clinical and kinematic outcomes at one year postoperatively and maintain the gain up to seven years after primary TKA, except for gait velocity which decreases over time, most likely along with ageing.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".