De Sitter spacetime as a coherent state: non-perturbative analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We discuss an explicit construction of a four-dimensional de Sitter spacetime as a coherent (Glauber-Sudarshan) state.The path integrals approach is used to calculate the scalar field expectation value on a coherent state.A special diagrammatic technique is introduced to simplify and visualize the calculations.The perturbative computations lead to an asymptotic series which are then analyzed by means of the Borel resummation technique.This procedure reveals the non-perturbative structure of the system.The analysis of our simplified toy model suggests the possible construction of a stable four-dimensional de Sitter spacetime as a Glauber-Sudarshan coherent state.The non-perturbative data gleaned from the Borel resummation of the asymptotic series strongly points towards a positive cosmological constant. AbrgNous discutons une construction explicite d'un espace de Sitter en quatre dimensions comme tat cohrent (Glauber-Sudarshan).L'approche des intgrales de chemin est utilise pour calculer la valeur d'attente du champ scalaire sur un tat cohrent.Une technique graphique spciale est introduite pour simplifier et visualiser les calculs.Les calculs perturbateurs conduisent une srie asymptotique qui est ensuite analyse au moyen de la technique de reprise de Borel.Cette procdure rvle la structure non-perturbative du systme.L'analyse de notre modle simplifi suggre la construction possible d'un espace de Sitter stable en quatre dimensions comme un tat cohrent.Les donnes non-perturbatives glanes partir de la reprise de Borel de la srie asymptotique pointe fortement vers une constante cosmologique positive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".