Die Tempel und Altäre der Artemis in Ephesos und ihre Baumaterialien. Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes in Wien|Band 80/2011 80|
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At Ephesos, six successive temples and altars were erected to Artemis from the early 7th until the late 4thbr/century B.C. Based on the analysis of the stratigraphy and find contexts, the first four constructions can br/now be dated to the period from the second quarter of the 7th century until the end of the 7th century. They br/were constructed of limestone marl slabs. Marble was used for the first time after the second quarter of br/the 6th century, for the Dipteros 1 (›Croesus-Temple‹). The foundation in the west, formerly known as the br/›Hecatompedos‹, was the altar which belonged to it. For both structures, marble of the type ›Ephesos II‹ br/was employed, which most probably came from the quarry near Belevi. After the mid-4th century B.C. the br/new Dipteros 2 was erected, using marble of the type ›Ephesos I‹ from the quarry at Ketli Çiftlik. A monumental court altar belonged to Dipteros 2, within which older structures made of ›Ephesos II‹ marble were br/integrated. The paving also was of this type of marble, and was reused in the court altar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".