Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors in Care of Child Protective Services: Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges in the Protection of Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domestic sex trafficking is a growing concern across Canada with the majority of victims being minors under the age of 18. Youth in care of Child Welfare (CW) are particularly at risk for exploitation. Much of the extant research on sex trafficking is American based, leaving gaps in our knowledge as to why CW youth are at risk within the Canadian geopolitical and cultural context. With police being central agents in the extraction and protection of victims, they offer unique insights into issues of recruitment, approaches to support victims and barriers to exiting sex trafficking that have not previously been explored. This dissertation consists of three studies examining issues of the domestic sex trafficking of minors. Study 1 is a published systematic review (Baird & Connolly, 2021) that synthesizes literature from 23 peer-reviewed articles on the exploitation processes and tactics used by traffickers in the sex trafficking of minors in Canada and the US. Study 1 describes a sexual exploitation continuum comprising three distinct components; the recruitment context, entrapment strategies used by traffickers, and enmeshment tactics used to prolong exploitation. The reviewed articles highlight the ways traffickers cater their approach to the specific vulnerabilities of the youth they exploit. Study 2 is a published file review (Baird, McDonald, & Connolly, 2020) that narrows the focus of sex trafficking to the Canadian context. Using secondary data from a police agency in southern Ontario, data from 223 victims were examined to explore the elevated risk status of CW involved youth who are victims of sex trafficking compared to non-CW victimized youth. Findings from Study 2 underscore the high-risk status of CW youth, with these youth being recruited at a younger age, more likely to use drugs and alcohol, to have experience of childhood maltreatment, and to have lived in a group home. Traffickers were described to use online platforms and relationships to recruit youth. Study 3 expands on the results of Study 2, by exploring the perceptions of police officers on a specialized human trafficking team on issues related to CW youth risk for recruitment, barriers to exiting, and their specific approaches to prevention and intervention. This team provided cohesive insights on the unique vulnerabilities of CW youth making them visible to traffickers and invisible within the CW system, various emotional and systemic barriers that prolong exploitation or increase risk for re-entry, and the relationship-focused and victim-centered approaches the team takes in their efforts to extract youth from the sex trade. Implications for practice, policy and research are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".