MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065305058

“Don’t Freaking Act Here! This is Reality!”: Reality Web Series Ultra Rich Asian Girls as Digital Autoethnography

2017· other· en· W7065305058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectrical and Electromagnetic Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityVoyeurismSensationalismCriticismReality televisionReality tvConsumption (sociology)Moral panic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kevin Li’s reality YouTube series Ultra Rich Asian Girls, featuring a cast of extraordinarily wealthy young Chinese Canadian women in Vancouver, British Columbia, has garnered controversy from its inception in 2014. The four young women featured in the first season of the show – Chelsea, Florence, Joy, and Coco – offer a tantalizing glimpse into the daily lives of the second generation of Canada’s Chinese model minority: one that has reaped the rewards from their parents’ efforts in Asia’s economic boom and earned criticism for its conspicuous consumption during a period of fear of potential backlash against Canadian multiculturalism. Although Ultra Rich Asian Girls falls outside the conceived scope of racialized or immigrant life-writing, this article argues that it still functions as a form of autoethnography, albeit within a new digital realm. Through its utilization of techniques and tropes from reality television, the series reveals the audience’s own voyeurism as consumers of an exoticized raced and gendered subject. Far from being a simple form of satire and objectification, Ultra Rich Asian Girls is also an example of subjectivity and agency, as the cast members work to create avatars of themselves to both each other and the viewers. However, as the series progresses, incongruities and discrepancies in a number of the women’s carefully tailored self-representations come to light: Florence’s family’s wealth is investigated for potential links to criminal activity, while Coco is accused of being a fraud by her fellow cast members. With these controversies, therefore, Ultra Rich Asian Girls serves as an example of the tensions between truth and fiction prevalent in today’s discussions about digital and television media. Thus, by understanding the series as a form of autoethnography, this article will also question assumptions of authenticity and veracity within the genre of life writing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicElectrical and Electromagnetic ResearchFrench-language works237,207