El paper de la frontera en el conflicte entre revolució i contrarevolució: 1820-1823
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumLa frontera politicoadministrativa ha jugat un paper molt important en els conflictes poltics, militars i culturals entre revoluci i contrarevoluci al llarg del segle xix.I un dels aspectes ms destacats ha estat que aquest paper no ha estat sempre el mateix, sin que ha variat amb els temps.La llarga disputa entre revoluci i contrarevoluci a l'Europa del primer ter del segle xix, tindr un ress especial a les terres catalanes dividides per una frontera que en aquells moments s'estava consolidant a nivell poltic i militar, i fins i tot cultural.En aquest text analitzem el paper que va jugar la frontera francoespanyola en el territori catal durant el conflicte entre revoluci i contrarevoluci, centrant-nos en l'anomenat Trienni Liberal (1820-1823).Fins i tot en un perode tan curt, la frontera juga papers diferents.Entre 1814 i 1820 els liberals exiliats a Frana conspiraran contra el rgim absolutista fernand, per alhora seran un factor d'inestabilitat a la Frana de la Restauraci.Amb la nova proclamaci de la Constituci el 1820, seran els absolutistes els que cercaran refugi, protecci i recursos a l'altra banda de la frontera, i des d'on prepararan la contrarevoluci, no sense crear tamb problemes a la monarquia francesa.Finalment, a partir de 1823, tornar l'exili liberal a refugiar-se a Frana i no sols conspirar contra l'absolutisme espanyol, sin que participar activament en les conspiracions liberals a Frana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".