DUARTE LECTURE 2015 08 29, 12.31 AM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Music Itself! Folk Phenomenology and the Return to Original Melody Eduardo Duarte, Hofstra University Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver August 27, 2015 Education, as Hannah Arendt showed us, exists in a pre-political sphere, and this means it is properly understood as existing against the state. How do we arrive at this ‘proper’ understanding of education, to this utopian intuition, which is to say, How are we moved into and then occupy the utopos of Education? This paper takes up these questions by returning to the category of music-making philosophy. The category of music-making philosophy arrives to us from the prophetic writing of Nietzsche, who prognosticated the renewal of a chorus based poetic praxis, or what we would today describe as the dialogic learning community. Like the chorus of Greek tragedy, the dialogic learning community occupies a time and space outside of the chronological events unfolding in the state-controlled political realm; it arises in the utopos of Education. Music-making philosophy via poetic praxis is thus a collective working out of a counter-culture through a mimetic representation of music’s non-intentional and radically independent ontology. It is the dialectical negation of the instrumental rationality of data driven ‘schooling’. The return to Nietzsche’s category enables this paper to accomplish two aims: first, to take up what Theodor Adorno identifies as “the right of music – all music – to exist,” and, second, to present the method, folk phenomenology, that discloses this “right of music – all music -- to exist”; folk phenomenology mediates an effacement with what Nietzsche called “the original melody.” Thus, the thesis to be taken up in this paper is the following: the disclosure via folk phenomenology of music’s right to exist is prior to any music-making philosophy . Before we enter Education, then, we must first return to the music itself!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.356 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".