MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065579022

Exploring Early Childhood Educators and Teachers’ Beliefs and Operationalization of Self-Regulation in Ontario Kindergarten Classrooms

2021· dissertation· en· W7065579022 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploratory researchContext (archaeology)CLARITYGovernment (linguistics)Population
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-regulation skills lay the foundation for long-term social, emotional, behavioural, and educational well-being (Zelazo et al., 2016) and develop rapidly between the ages of 3-7 years through direct teaching practices (Dignath et al., 2016). Despite the critical importance of supporting self-regulation capabilities, research shows that few teachers explicitly teach self-regulation skills (Spruce & Bol., 2015) due to a lack of conceptual clarity in empirical and practical literature (Jones et al., 2016). The Kindergarten Program (2016) in Ontario provides an opportunity to capture the voices of early years educators on this topic because of its unique teaching team. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory study is threefold: 1) to examine the ways early years educators define self-regulation, 2) to understand the strategies and practices that early years educators use to foster self-regulation development, and 3) to articulate the ways educator training influences teacher beliefs and self-regulation practices in kindergarten. 
\nThis study uses a mixed-methods approach to capture the voices from Ontario’s Full Day Kindergarten teaching team. Using an adapted version of the Self-Regulated Learning Teacher Belief Scale (Lombart et al., 2009), early childhood educators (ECEs) and OCT certified teachers provided insight into early years educators beliefs, knowledge, and operationalization of self-regulation. Results from this study demonstrate that both professions hold high beliefs towards the promotion of self-regulation and children’s capabilities to self-regulate. However, ECEs and teachers have different understandings of self-regulation as well as use different strategies and practices to foster self-regulation. For example, this study finds ECEs are more prepared for teaching self-regulation because their training has specifically focused on and highlighted this area of child development, while the majority of teachers did not learn about self-regulation in their professional training. With this finding, we can now look at ways to integrate this information into the training of teachers and potentially reform parts of the teacher training program. Overall, the findings build on existing self-regulation literature and provide a new contribution by including the perspectives of early years educators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207