MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065628848

Efficacy of combined physical and occupational therapy treatment of patients with sub acute neuralgic amyotrophy:\na proof of principle pilot-study

2012· dissertation· en· W7065628848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUtrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupational therapyMultidisciplinary approachChecklistRehabilitationIntervention (counseling)Activities of daily livingManual therapy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction\nCurrently no evidence is available for a multidisciplinary intervention helping people with upper extremity complaints who are recovering from neuralgic amyotrophy (NA). These patients encounter numerous difficulties in daily life and are often not able to resume work activities. We have developed a multidisciplinary treatment program for these patients, combining physical therapy and occupational therapy. We have tried to establish a proof of principle for this treatment program\nDesign\nProof of principle pilot study\nMethods\nEight patients recovering >6 months after NA, recruited from our outpatient clinic, have been structurally measured 3 months before and during the treatment period. All patients received eight sessions of occupational- and physical therapy over a period of 16 weeks. Including proprioceptive shoulder training, strength training, behavioral therapy and teaching of energy conservation techniques.\nResults\nPatients showed no significant change in patients, three months prior to entering the program.\nAt the end of program, patients show large and statistically significant improvements (p<0.025) on the canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) (+2.0 points) and shoulder rating questionnaire (SRQ) (+46%) measurements. The majority of patients also show large improvements in disability of arm shoulder and hand (DASH) scores and increase of serratus anterior muscle strength (6 of 8 patients). Checklist individual strength (CIS)-fatique scores did not change significantly.\nConclusion\nResults clearly show that therapy has not damaged or disadvantaged participants. They show a big improvement in efficacy in our patients. Patients learn to adapt to their complaints and limitations, are able to function better and reach higher satisfaction. Further research into a multidisciplinary approach for people recovering from NA is advised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUtrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207