Estudio de factibilidad para la comercialización y exportación de café (Coffea arabica) a Canadá, Vancouver, desde un centro de acopio situado en Manta, Ecuador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a feasibility study for the marketing, industrialization and exportation of coffee (Coffea arabica) from Zaruma. It will be transported to Manta to make the labors of grinding, wrapped and packaging; with the purpose to export the product to Vancouver, Canada. The study involves the purchase of 48 bags of 45.5kg, to obtain an output of 6,144 boxes of 340.2 grams per month. The center of collection will be located in the way to Jaramijó, 10 minutes from Manta´s port, which in the future will turn into one of the major port of Ecuador. \nCanada is a country with a high consumption of coffee; in fact, it is situated in eleventh place in the world. Canada has an annual average of coffee intake about 6.5 kilograms per capita. The project ratifies the unmet demand that the above mentioned country take as this product. The goal will be to obtained excellent quality to satisfy this sophisticated segment. The financial study shows that the project is financially viable, giving an attractive profit and quick return of investment. The financial indicators were an IRR of 45%, an NPV of $368,473.74 and benefic – cost ratio of 2.20, showing profitability. The calculated equilibrium point for this project confirmed the feasibility of it, since the quantity of boxes to sell to obtain neither losses nor earning, does not even reach 30% of the annual production of the product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".