MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065742831

An Efficient Gauss-Newton Algorithm for Symmetric Low-Rank Product Matrix Approximatins

2014· report· en· W7065742831 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRice University's digital scholarship archive (Rice University) · 2014
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesPeking UniversityCentre de Recherches MathématiquesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsKrylov subspaceRate of convergenceConvergence (economics)Singular value decompositionMatrix (chemical analysis)Subspace topologySimple (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Singular value
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive and study a Gauss-Newton method for computing the symmetric low-rank product (SLRP) XXT, where X / Rnkfor k<n, that is the closest approximation to a given symmetric matrix A / Rnn in Frobenius norm. When A=BTB (or BBT), this problem essentially reduces to finding a truncated singular value decomposition of B. Our Gauss-Newton method, which has a particularly simple form, shares the same order of iteration-complexity as a gradient method when k << n, but can be significantly faster on a wide range of problems. In this paper, we prove global convergence and a Q-linear convergence rate for this algorithm, and perform numerical experiments on various test problems, including those from recently active areas of matrix completion and robust principal component analysis. Numerical results show that the proposed algorithm is capable of providing considerable speed advantages over Krylov subspace methods on suitable application problems. Moreover, the algorithm possesses a higher degree of concurrency than Krylov subspace methods, thus offering better scalability on modern multi/many-core computers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRice University's digital scholarship archive (Rice University)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207