Fear and anxiety in the children suffering from infantile cerebral palsy and raised in families with various parental subsystems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© 2015, Canadian Center of Science and Education. All rights reserved. The education of the special needs children has been in the very focus of attention in our country in recent years. The inclusive education concept got a vast popularity and has already started to be intensively implemented into the Russian upbringing process. Though, it is necessary to take into account plenty of various nuances. The challenge of psychological peculiarities of the special needs children is one among the above mentioned. The present article is dedicated to the children suffering from infantile cerebral palsy (ICP), whereas this disease is something special within the classification of the muscular-skeletal system disorders in children. It is a multi-factorial disease that combines different variants of mental developmental disabilities. Primary school age coincides with the first perception of one's disability. The history of illness complicates, the situational behavioral disorders are closely interconnected with psychoorganic ones; cerebroasthenic, apathy-adynamic and hyperdynamic types are the most often among them. The necessity of accommodation and socialization among the schoolmates are added hereto together with study load, etc. On the basis thereof, the hypothesis was developed that the ICP primary schoolchildren have a high level of anxiety and fears. For proving that and also in order to reveal the peculiarities of the anxiety and fears, if any in such children, the present research has been performed. It has been also fixed that the ICP children are brought up in the families with various parental subsystems, as a part of this study. To that end, the parallel was drawn between the anxiety level, fears peculiarities and family structure, where the child is brought up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".