HUBUNGAN ANTARA DUKUNGAN SOSIAL DAN KEMATANGAN EMOSI DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals who enter early adulthood will face many problems in the completion of studies and \nother problems. Individuals who quarter life crisis are characterized by emotional responses such \nas panic, unstable, helpless, depressed to depression. This can be affected by several causes, \nincluding lack of social support and mature emotions. The study aims to find out the relationship of \nquarter life crisis in final-level students reviewed from social support and emotional maturity. This \nresearch uses correlational quantitative methods. With the initial adult population across Indonesia \nas much as 22,520,014. Then the number of subjects in this study was 425 people. The sampling \ntechnique used in this study is incidental sampling technique. Instruments used for data retrieval \nare quarter life crisis scale, social support scale, and emotional maturity scale. The data analysis \nmethod in this study is a multiple regression analysis for major hypotheses and pearson product \nmoment correlation for minor hypotheses. The results of the study found that social support and \nemotional maturity played a significant role with quarter life crisis. Effective donation of quarter \nlife crisis of 24.8%. This research is the beginning to analyze quarter life crisis, hopefully this \nresearch can be continued to look at various variables that are thought to contribute to quarter life \ncrisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".