MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065920899

Exploring Perspectives of Youth with and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and varying intersectional identities towards a Mixed Abilities Physical Education Program and Quality Participation Experiences

2023· article· en· W7065920899 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumQuality (philosophy)IntersectionalityBelongingnessPhysical educationClass (philosophy)Youth studiesIdentity (music)Entitlement (fair division)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and various marginalized social identities (e.g. race, SES) have limited opportunities in to engage in physical education (PE). Guided by the theory of intersectionality and the quality participation (QP) framework, this exploratory case study investigated how to develop a mixed abilities PE curriculum in a marginalized school community in Ontario, Canada. Participants included youth with (n=3) and without (n=6) IDD, teachers (n=8), educational assistants (n=2), and a vice principal (n=1). Multiple methods were used including participant observation, guided photovoice, and semi structured interviews. A multi-level intersectional analysis was taken to explore the relationship between identities of participants, the sociopolitical school system and the building blocks of QP. School staff and students demonstrated interest in a mixed abilities PE program but noted certain requirements including: building strong rapport between staff and students in the program, inclusive instruction, appropriately trained staff, a student-matching process, and strategies for program sustainability. Youth with and without IDD provided similar examples for how the QP building blocks related to belongingness and meaning could be implemented in the program, e.g., having friends in the same class and fostering personal connections towards course materials. Youth also discussed how their intersectional social identities impacted their quality participation experiences (e.g., unable to afford sports programming outside of school). The results of this research will inform the essential components needed to develop an appropriate mixed abilities PE curriculum for youth with IDD and varying intersectional identities, based on the theoretical underpinnings of quality participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInclusion and Disability in Education and SportFrench-language works237,207