MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065955633

Evaluation of the retinal hemodynamics in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and differing nocturnal blood pressure profiles

2014· article· en· W7065955633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen angle glaucomaHypercapniaHemodynamicsGlaucomaRetinalBlood pressureMean arterial pressureBlood flow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To evaluate the retinal hemodynamic response to normoxic hypercapnia among patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and differing nocturnal blood pressure (NBP) profiles, using Doppler spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: Doppler SD-OCT retinal blood flow (RBF) measurement was acquired using the circum-papillary double circular scan protocol of the RTVue system (Optovue Inc., Freemont, CA). The sample consisted of 17 healthy controls (group mean age 62±7 years; group mean NBP dip 14±8%); 17 POAG with normal NBP dip (age 66±9 years; NBP dip 11±5%), termed “dippers”; and 16 POAG with high NBP dip (age 64±7 years; NBP dip 24±5%), “over-dippers”. The NBP dip magnitude was calculated by taking the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the day and night while awake and asleep, respectively. Automated gas blender (RespiractTM, Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto) was used to stably provoke normoxic hypercapnia (15% increase in the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure relative to homeostatic baseline). Six Doppler SD-OCT RBF scans were acquired, during baseline and also during normoxic hypercapnia. RBF parameters were calculated and ANOVA was used to compare values between groups (p<0.05). Results: Total RBF at baseline was significantly different between the groups with controls being the highest (37.1±4.4µL/min), and over-dippers the lowest (29.6±9.0µL/min). Venous area showed significant differences at baseline between the groups with the lowest value in the over-dipper group, and the highest in the control group (39.9±7.0(x10-3)µm, and 46.6±6.6x(10-3)µm, respectively). Velocity was not significantly different between groups (p=0.27) at baseline. Breathing normoxic hypercapnia provoked an increase in flow that was significantly lower in the over-dipper group (1.0±8.6µL/min) and highest in the controls (8.2±10.8µL/min). Change in velocity was significantly different (p=0.02) between the groups, being highest in the control group (2.4±3.3mm/s) and lowest in the over-dipper group (-0.6±3.1mm/s). Venous area change was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Patients with POAG who exhibited an exaggerated nocturnal reduction in MAP also demonstrated lower baseline RBF values and an impeded retinal vascular response to normoxic hypercapnia, indicating greater vascular dysregulation in this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it