Improving Accessibility of Family Health Teams for People With Mobility Disabilities: Examining Rooms With Adjustable Tables and Lifts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the recent focus on primary care reform, adults with physical disabilities continue to experience difficulties with access to primary care. The current initiative was launched jointly by the Canadian Disability Policy Alliance, Queen's University Centre for Health Services & Policy Research, The Spinal Cord Injury Ontario, and the Primary Care Team at the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, to improve access to Family Health Teams and Nurse Practitioner-led Clinics in Ontario for people with mobility impairments. The specific change we sought was to have at least one examining room in each FHT and NP-led Clinic equipped with an adjustable examining table and/or a ceiling-track lift. Using the Learning Collaborative approach, we contributed to tangible changes in the primary care environment toward increased equity and accessibility for people with disabilties. All 50 of the newest FHTs and 25 Nurse Practitioner-led Clinics (100%) have been advised of their obigations under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, provided with information about increasing accessibility in their examinig rooms, and sensitized to the needs of disabled patients in the practice. Further initiatives to build on the current success are already underway. As a result of this project, durable links between decision makers, primary care organizations, disability organizations and university researchers have been forged that promise to continue to contribute positively to the accessibility of the primary care environment in Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".