IDENTIFYING COMPLEXITIES AND BARRIERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RETURN-TO-WORK PROCESS FOR FIREFIGHTERS AND THE DISABILITY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES USED TO PROMOTE A SUCCESSFUL RETURN-TO-WORK FOR FIREFIGHTERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Firefighters have a high risk of injuries or illnesses, which can result in workplace absences. Considering the unique occupational context of firefighting, firefighters may require unique disability management strategies to promote a successful and timely return-to-work. Objectives: To explore the facilitators, barriers and complexities of return-to-work for firefighters, and the current strategies used to promote return-to-work for firefighters. We also explored generic return-to-work strategies as they are applicable to all occupations. Methods: For the integrative review, we searched databases, grey literature and online resources to identify strategies, facilitators and barriers of return-to-work for firefighters. We used qualitative methods for the other studies, including interviews about return-to-work processes. For second and third studies, we used interpretive descriptions to analyze the interviews with disability management professionals. For the fourth study, we used qualitative descriptive methods to analyze the interviews with career firefighters. Results: We identified return-to-work strategies barriers for firefighters from our review including occupation-specific exercises and return-to-work readiness assessments. For the second study, disability management professionals discussed the need for accurate medical documentation and communication with stakeholders to identify suitable modified duties and return-to-work plans. In the third study, disability management professionals identified that firefighters required standard and firefighter-specific return-to-work principles, including prioritizing the recovery process over a timely return to modified duties. In the fourth study, firefighters agreed that rehabilitation was important because they must be physically able to perform their firefighting tasks. Firefighters disliked sedentary modified duties. Conclusions: The return-to-work process for firefighters may be complex due to their unique occupational context, and disability management professionals should implement occupation-specific strategies with standard strategies. It is important for disability management personnel who are not aware of the unique occupational context of firefighting to collaborate with firefighters to identify firefighter-specific return-to-work strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".