L’argent des familles : Usages et significations des allocations familiales chez les couples québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Près d’un million de parents québécois reçoivent les allocations familiales canadiennes et \nquébécoises, des sommes versées par l’État pour le soutien économique des enfants. Pourtant, \non en sait peu sur ce qu’il advient de cet argent lorsqu’il franchit la porte du foyer. Cette recherche \ns’intéresse aux usages et aux significations associées aux allocations familiales chez les couples \nde sexe différent du Québec. Elle explore également le rôle et l’impact de l’État sur les usages et \nles significations des allocations familiales au sein des familles, de même que les impacts des \nallocations familiales sur les dynamiques de genre au sein des couples. Un cadre théorique en \ntrois volets jette un éclairage sur ce projet de recherche, soit la signification sociale de l’argent, le \nchamp familial et la division sexuelle du travail. Neuf parents québécois, soit sept mères et deux \npères, ont participé à des entretiens semi-dirigés au sujet de leur organisation financière et \nfamiliale au sein de leur foyer. L’analyse du discours des parents permet d’observer que les \nallocations familiales font l’objet de marquages qui leur sont propres : il s’agit d’argent familial vu \ncomme un soutien financier qui se distingue d’un salaire. L’analyse révèle également qu’il existe \ntoujours une division sexuelle du travail au sein des foyers et que les politiques familiales et \nsociales de l’État contribuent à cette division. Finalement, les modes de gestions de l’argent des \nparents rencontrés ont le potentiel de fragiliser l’autonomie financière du parent au plus faible \nrevenu. \n<br /><br /> \nNearly one million Quebec parents receive Canadian and Quebec family allowances, amounts \npaid by the state for the economic support of children. Yet little is known about what happens to \nthat money when it gets into the household. This research focuses on the social uses and \nmeanings of family allowances within Quebec couples. It also explores the influence and role of \nthe state on the uses and meanings of family allowances as well as the gender dynamics in the \nmanagement of this money. A three-part theoretical framework sheds light on this research \nproject: the social meaning of money, the family field and the sexual division of labour. Nine \nQuebec parents, seven mothers and two fathers, took part in semi-structured interviews about \ntheir financial and family organization within their household. The parents’ speech analysis reveals \nthat the family allowances are earmarked in specific ways : they are family money seen as a \nfinancial support distinguished from a salary. The analysis also reveals that there is still a sexual \ndivision of labor within households and that state family and social policies contribute to this \ndivision. Finally, the money management methods of the parents we met have potentially weaken \nthe financial autonomy of the parent with the lowest income.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".