L’insécurité résidentielle des femmes cheffes de ménages monoparentaux sur le marché locatif privé de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette recherche, je m’intéresse à l’insécurité résidentielle des mères monoparentales qui se logent sur le marché locatif privé à Montréal. En contexte d’un marché locatif montréalais sous tension, les familles monoparentales sont surreprésentées dans la catégorie des ménages ayant des « besoins impérieux en logement ». Pourtant, plusieurs de ces ménages doivent compter sur le marché locatif privé pour se loger considérant l’inaccessibilité des autres segments de l’habitation. Or, je souhaite comprendre comment se manifeste l’insécurité résidentielle des mères monoparentales locataires au travers des relations qu’elles entretiennent autour et dans le logement. Ainsi, j’ai lié le concept de sécurité d’occupation (secure occupancy) à l’approche des parcours résidentiels (housing pathways) afin de documenter leur expérience de l’insécurité résidentielle. Cette étude qualitative présente les résultats de huit entretiens semi-dirigés réalisés avec des mères monoparentales locataires visant à comprendre le sens accordé à leur vécu de l’insécurité au fil de leur parcours résidentiel en lien avec cinq dimensions relationnelles (leur propriétaire ou locateur, leurs enfants, leur ex-conjoint, leur entourage et leur voisinage). Cette approche relationnelle m’a permis, d’une part, de documenter leur expérience de l’insécurité résidentielle et d’une autre part, de mettre de l’avant les tactiques déployées dans leurs pratiques quotidiennes afin d’y résister. \n<br /><br /> \nIn this research, I am interested in the housing insecurity of single mothers who live on the private rental sector in Montreal. In the context of a tight Montreal rental market, single-parent families are overrepresented in the category of households in “core housing need”. However, many of these households must rely on the private rental market for housing due to the inaccessibility of other housing segments. However, I want to understand how the residential insecurity of single mother manifests itself through the relationships they maintain around and in the dwelling. Thus, I linked the concept of secure occupancy to the approach of housing pathways in order to document their experience of residential insecurity. This qualitative study presents the results of eight semi-directed interviews carried out with single mothers who are tenants, aiming to understand the meaning given to their experience of insecurity throughout their residential journey in relation to five relational dimensions (their landlord, their children, their ex-spouse, their entourage and their neighbors). This relational approach allowed me to document their experience of residential insecurity and, on the other hand, to put forward the tactics deployed in their daily practices in order to resist it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".