MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067549402

Long-term effects of Hanen parent programmes: A perspective from Canadian parents

2018· dissertation· en· W7067549402 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQueen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Reflection (computer programming)Parenting skillsLongitudinal data
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed study explores the impact of Hanen parent programmes (HPPs) from an often overlooked angle: parents’ self reflection on their parenting skills acquired from Hanen courses. Parental input is a vital component of a child’s development. To date, parent self reflection remains largely unstudied. The proposed study intends to expand academic knowledge of parental reflection of HPPs over time. The present study will examine parental knowledge, attitudes, and confidence from the HPPs in a Canadian context with longitudinal follow-up. Data will be compared at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after parents have completed the HPP. The most noteworthy comparison will be between the first and last months, measuring whether there is a lasting effect of HPPs on parents over time. The expected study results are anticipated to lend support to HPPs as initially effective (i.e. large impact with initial 1 month measurements), but become less effective over time (i.e. smaller impact found at 24 months). The study could provide evidence for follow-up Hanen ‘refresher’ courses where parents receive a brief review of their skills acquired from previous classes to continue optimal family interaction. The reported parental knowledge, perceived attitudes, and perceived confidence is expected to decrease over time. Additional potential implications include providing data for academic research exploring the impact that HPPs have on parents over time. It is predicted that parents’ Hanen-acquired skills continue to evolve as their children develop, but this growth of skills could be supported with additional Hanen course knowledge. There are potential clinical implications for practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs), who are often the professionals referring parents to HPPs. This proposed study would provide empirical support of the impact that HPPs have on parents (and therefore children); this support is welcome in an evidence-based profession like SLP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University)Same topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207