Mental Health Promotion: A Framework for Action and Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
concepts of health promotion in order to providea framework for the action of those who work inmental health. Since the Ottawa charter, newreferences on health can contribute significantlyfor the education and action of the mental healthpractitioner. In order to promote and enhancebetter and healthier ways if living as well asRecibido: Junio 5 de 2006.Aceptado: Agosto 18 de 2006.* Psicóloga de la Universidad Javeriana, Master of Arts,Gouchar College. Profesora auxiliar de Psicología de laFacultad de Medicina de la Universidad del Rosario.Correo electrónico: maria.restrepo41@urosario.edu.co.Disclaimer: Por medio de la presente descargo decualquier responsabilidad a otra persona diferentea la autora de este artículo. Declaro, así mismo,que no existen compromisos adquiridos con algunafuente de financiación y que el artículo no ha sidopublicado ni parcial ni totalmente.Promoción de la salud mental: un marco para laformación y para la acciónMental Health Promotion: A Framework for Action and EducationMaría Helena Restrepo-Espinosa*better life conditions. Mental health is consideredas a tool for the understanding and constructionof the sense of well being and well living. In ourcountry our professional training programs haveunderstood the importance of educating in amore integrated and holistic way in the searchfor creative approaches for problems we face inour every day life, based on the hope that a bettercountry with more equity and justice, as well asbetter and healthier conditions can be more thanjust a dream.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.072 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.085 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.033 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Research integrity | 0.026 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".