MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067809249

Multiculturalism from a Chinese perspective : minority education in Yunnan Province, China

2005· dissertation· en· W7067809249 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)MulticulturalismChinaEthnic groupImmigrationWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on multiculturalism and multicultural education from a Chinese perspective.It aims at promoting understanding of minority education in China, through the use of the Canadian conception of multiculturalism and multicultural education, as an important step toward improving China's minority education.This study examines minority education in the Yunnan Province of China by addressing three areas: funding, programs, and outcomes for minority people.By looking into these areas, the study seeks to asceftain whether the policies and practices in Yunan province are consistent with the principles embedded in Canadian multiculturalism.The data interpretation and analysis in this research suggest that efforts to pursue multicultural education in Canada are echoed by govemment efforts in the area of minority education in China.Multicultural education in Canada and minority education in China have the same goal in seeking equality, cultural retention, and cultural accommodation in education.encouragement, and guidance along the path toward completion of this thesis.His knowledge and insights were invaluable.Thanks also to the other members of my committee, Dr. Jon Young and Dr. Pat Mathews, for their helpful and perceptive critiques and for having arranged their schedules to help me meet my deadlines.A most special "thank-you" goes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicChina's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsFrench-language works237,207