MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067829549

New World Next Week: Episode220 - Caving on Copyright, COMER Vs Bank Of Canada, Moms Crash Monsanto

2015· other· en· W7067829549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrashCredibilityShareholderMonarchyEspionageRhetoricYard
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NewWorldNextWeek.com : Episode220 - Caving on Copyright, COMER Vs Bank Of Canada, Moms Crash Monsanto Welcome to New World Next Week - the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week: Story #1: Negotiators Burn Last Opportunity to Salvage the #TPP by Caving on Copyright Term Extension EBay Trying to Sneak TPP Support in the Back Door Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy (PDF) Story #2: The Case to "Reinstate" the Bank of Canada COMER Vs The Bank of Canada HSBC 'tax dodge' revelations are just tip of iceberg, says leaker Story #3: Moms Crash Monsanto Shareholder Meeting, Pass Shareowner Proxy Access Resolution @BeauBoeye: "ahha! My letter was published! This is just the beginning. Thanks guys!" Breyers Drops Milk Tainted With Monsanto’s RBST Colorado May Refund Millions In Weed Taxes #NewWorldNextWeek Updates: The Inevitable War with ISIS is Finally Declared Ukrainians Rage Against Military Draft Samsung's Smart TV Allows Spying On Its Users Visit NewWorldNextWeek.com to get previous episodes in various formats to download, burn and share. And as always, stay up-to-date by subscribing to the feeds from Corbett Report here and Media Monarchy here . Thank you. Previous: Episode219 - Globalized Healthcare, China's Real Names, Public Internet Good News

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3690.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207