MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067941175

Motor control exercise according to Richardson and McGill approaches on abdominal muscles recruitment pattern during rapid arm movements and pain Intensity in subjects with chronic low back pain

2021· dissertation· en· W7067941175 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Repository of the Polytechnic Institute of Porto (Polytechnic Institute of Porto) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotor controlLow back painElectromyographyTrunkLumbarAbdominal musclesTransversus abdominis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) leads to impaired motor control and function of the trunk muscles. Different approaches for motor control exercise, like Carolyn Richardson and Stuart McGill, improve the core abdominal function in a long-term, providing lumbar dynamic stability. However, there is no consensus regarding the intervention on deep muscles feedward delay. To compare the effect of motor control exercise for dynamic stability accoring the Richardson and McGill approaches on abdominal muscles’ electromyographic (EMG) onset timing, during rapid arm movements, and pain intensity in subjects whit CLBP. Experimental study with a sample of 29 subjects volunteers with CLBP, randomly in Motor Control Exercise_Richardson Approach Group (MCE_Richardon) (n=9), Motor Control Exercise McGill Approach Group (MCE_McGill) (n=11) and Control Group (CG) (n=9). To evaluate timing of EMGonset during rapid arm flexion, abduction and extension movements was used surface electromyography of transversus abdominal/ internal oblique (TrA/IO), external oblique (EO), rectus abdominis (RA) and anterior, medium and posterior deltoids. The pain intensity was measured by visual analog scale. The experimental groups were subjected to diffrent motor control exerciso programs during 8 weeks, one according to the Richardson approach and another according to the McGill approach. The CG did not undertake any intervention. The assessements took place before and after 8 weeks of the application of exercise programs. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test was used to comparisons between groups, while the Dunn Test was used, with a significance level 0.05. After 8 weeks of completion the diferente motor control exercise programs (M1), EMG onset of the TrA/IO was significantly lower on the MCE_Richardson group, when compared with the CG, in all rapid arm movements (flexion: p=0.011; abduction p=0.010; extension: p=0.010). EMG onset of EO and RA was significantly lower on the MCE_McGill group, when compared with the CG, in all rapid arm movements (flexion: p=0.009 and p= 0.005; abduction: p=0.038 and p=0.016 and extension: p=0.005 and p=0.044, respectively). At M1, it was found that the pain intensity on MCE_Richardson was significantly lower when compared to CG (p˂0.001). Motor control exercise according to the Carolyn Richardson approach seems to have more effect on local stabilizing muscles (TrA/IO) while the approach of Stuar McGill appears to have more effect on global stabilizing muscles (EO and RA). However, only MCE_Richardson had a significant reduction on low back pain intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scientific Repository of the Polytechnic Institute of Porto (Polytechnic Institute of Porto)Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207