Numerical Simulation of the Wind-Driven Motions in a Two-Layered Lake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chapter 2 -LINEAR NUMERICAL MODEL 9 Basic assumptions of a general two-layered model 9 The volume transport form of the equations of motion and continuity for a two-layer model Chapter 3 -NUMERICAL SCHEME Description of numerical scheme Input parameters Rectangular models of Lake Ontario Chapter 4 -RESULTS OF SIMPLIFIED MODELS Case 1. One-dimensional channel and two-dimensional rectangular basin with flat bottom Case 2. One-dimensional channel and two-dimensional rectangular basin with variable depth in transverse direction only Chapter 5 -TWO-DIMENSIONAL RECTANGULAR BASIN WITH LAKE ONTARIO TOPOGRAPHY A. Models with various types of wind stresses only A. 1. Uniform westerly wind stress A.2. Periodic wind A. 3. Rotating uniform wind over the lake B. Models with various interfacial stress and bottom stress B. 1. Model with coefficient of interfacial stress 5. 0 cm 2 /sec and coefficient of bottom stress 0.0025 B. 2. Model with coefficient of interfacial stress 10. 0 cm 2 /sec and coefficient of bottom stress 0.0025 B. 3. Model with coefficient of interfacial stress 50.0 cm 2 /sec and coefficient of bottom stress 0. 0025
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".