MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7067991919

New virtual screening tools for molecular discovery

2009· dissertation· en· W7067991919 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsVirtual screeningDocking (animal)Drug discoveryFlexibility (engineering)Screening techniquesProtein–ligand dockingBridging (networking)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of molecular discovery, virtually screening large libraries of compounds proved to be often more cost-efficient than the traditional experimental approaches. In fact, it has now become common practice thanks to the virtual screening tools available to chemists in the pharmaceutical industry, specifically docking. Most docking programs do not account for the dynamics associated with protein-ligand binding whether it is protein flexibility or the inclusion of displaceable water molecules. FITTED1.0 was developed to include these specific two features and has been validated on a testing set of 33 protein-ligand complexes. Further developments were needed to increase the speed of FITTED to enable its application as virtual screening tool. This enhanced version, FITTED1.5, has been applied to the screening of the Maybridge library onto the HCV polymerase and revealed FITTED’S ability to identify active substances. With this and other successful applications of FITTED, a comparative study was performed against other docking programs, with a specific interest in the effect of the ligand and protein input conformation and the inclusion of bridging water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs. All three had major effects on accuracy and led to suggestions on how to better conduct comparative studies. In parallel, we applied our expertise in the virtual screening area to the field of asymmetric catalyst development and led to the creation of ACE1.0. When creating a tool for predicting steroselectivities, one has to describe the transition state with great accuracy although within a reasonable amount of time. To tackle this problem, ACE creates the transition states from linear combinations of reactant and product interactions. A genetic algorithm is then exploited as a conformational search engine to optimize the TS structure. ACE has been applied to the Diels-Alder cycloaddition and the proline-catalysed aldol reactions and has showed good correlatio

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicGene expression and cancer classification→French-language works237,207→