MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7068851334

Full Issue

2024· article· en· W7068851334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaLiquationDiafiltrationEmperipolesisTriacetinDurvalumab
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shorebirds (Charadriiformes: Charadriidae, Recurvirostridae, and Scolopacidae) migrate through Tennessee enroute to their wintering grounds in South America and coastal U.S .and to their breeding grounds in northern U .S. and Canada.Of the 3 1 shorebirds that are discussed here, only the Killdeer (Charadrius vociferud and S p t d Sandpiper (Actitis muculariaj are known to nest in Tennessee.Suitable inland stopover sites are generally scarce with most migrants depending on the exposed shoreline of lakes and rivers.Spring rains begin to fill reservoirs in April, thereby eliminating the majority of this habitat during peak migration periods.Conversely, reservoir shorelines are usually not exposed until mid-October, after peak fall shorebird numbers have passed through.Consequently, inland areas suitable for resting and feeding of migrant shorebirds are very valuable.The Kingston Steam Plant (KSP), located near the confluence of the Clinch and Emory Rivers and about 5 km from Walden Ridge in Roane County, is one of the few sites in Tennessee where large numbers of migrant shorebirds stop with a high degree of predictability.Birds are attracted to the flats and open waters of the plant's 80 ha ash disposal area (Figure 1 ).The first published shorebird records for this site appeared in 1970 just three years after the ash disposal area was completed.Scattered records of shorebird sightings appear in the literature from [1970][1971][1972][1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978].However, intensive birding was not conducted until 1979 when the site became widely recognized by ornithological groups in the State.In recognition of its ornithological importance, the KSP was designated as part of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agencyo< Wildlife Observation Area program in 1981.This program identifies and promotes public use of areas in Tennessee with large concentrations of observable wildlife.Although shorebirds are the primary attraction of the KSP site, many species of waterfowl.herons, gulls, terns.raptors, and sparrows are also regularly seen (Checklist of Waterbirds of the Kingston Steam Plant, L. J. Fowler, 1983 ).The purpose of this paper is to summarize records on the shorebirds of Kingston Steam Plant frdm 1970 to March 1983.Based upon these records, early and late observation dates and maximum numbets of each species are listed for both spring and fall seasons.Records for this paper were taken from The Migranr, American Birds, International Shorebird Survey computer printout ( 1 980-19831, and from my personal log (1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982).Nomenclature follows the American Ornithologists ' Union's Checklist of North American Birds (6th edition, 1983).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9510.933

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207