Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shorebirds (Charadriiformes: Charadriidae, Recurvirostridae, and Scolopacidae) migrate through Tennessee enroute to their wintering grounds in South America and coastal U.S .and to their breeding grounds in northern U .S. and Canada.Of the 3 1 shorebirds that are discussed here, only the Killdeer (Charadrius vociferud and S p t d Sandpiper (Actitis muculariaj are known to nest in Tennessee.Suitable inland stopover sites are generally scarce with most migrants depending on the exposed shoreline of lakes and rivers.Spring rains begin to fill reservoirs in April, thereby eliminating the majority of this habitat during peak migration periods.Conversely, reservoir shorelines are usually not exposed until mid-October, after peak fall shorebird numbers have passed through.Consequently, inland areas suitable for resting and feeding of migrant shorebirds are very valuable.The Kingston Steam Plant (KSP), located near the confluence of the Clinch and Emory Rivers and about 5 km from Walden Ridge in Roane County, is one of the few sites in Tennessee where large numbers of migrant shorebirds stop with a high degree of predictability.Birds are attracted to the flats and open waters of the plant's 80 ha ash disposal area (Figure 1 ).The first published shorebird records for this site appeared in 1970 just three years after the ash disposal area was com- THE MlGRANT JUNE FIGURE I . Ash disposa
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".