Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thomas Arne (1710-1778) seemed to have had a knack of penning a memorable and \nstirring British song, composing //Rule, Brittania!//, //A-hunting We Will Go// and - \nas arranged here - the (then-titled) //God Save The King// which has been the unofficial \nEnglish national anthem for a quarter of a millennium. In fact, there is no \nprescribed ‘official’ anthem for England or the UK, it is only determined by custom \nor popular use, but //God Save The King// (renamed when needed to //God Save The \nQueen//) has been selected repeatedly by the British people over the years with only \n//Jerusalem//, //Rule, Brittania!// and //Land of Hope and Glory// coming in to any \ncontention. In fact, although it is Arne who is usually credited as the composer and it \nis his version that we would be familiar today, he may not be the original writer of the \nmelody: a much older keyboard piece from 1619 exists by one Dr. John Bull which \nshares many of its melodic characteristics. In addition much of the lyrical content was \nwell known by the time Arne published the work in 1744, and some of the words may \nbe traced as far back as the Bible. Since the 18th century verses have been added and \nremoved (including some incendiary remarks about the Scots), so teasing out where \ncredit should be given in such cases is virtually impossible. These difficulties of \nhistorical tracing aside, //God Save the Queen/King// has been indelibly embedded in \nculture of the British public heard over the years in countless state ceremonies, \nsporting events and public broadcasts...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.076 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".