MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070120703

Palmer: BJ Palmer attempted blackmail - 1924

2022· other· en· W7070120703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperGossipHarmPerformance art
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1923 or 1924 Mabel Palmer, DC was contacted by the editor of Broadway Brevities who threatened to do harm to BJ Palmer, DC and his school, Palmer College of Chiropractic, is they did not support his magazine and endeavors. It was a blackmail scheme that had been used to extort money from prominent Americans for several years. This collection includes: · Extracts of news articles appearing in the New York Times, 1924-1925; · Broadway Brevities, October 1923, extracted items concerning chiropractic; · Several articles from newspapers around the country; · “Moses Annenberg (1877-1942)” and “Ken Browne (1900-1965).” Field Guide to wild American Pulp Artists [ https://www.pulpartists.com/Annenberg-P.html and https://www.pulpartists.com/Browne.html] · Roy Griffith. “The Belchings of Brevities,” (extract) Fountainhead News (23 September 1928); · New York Times, 1924 – extracts of other articles concerning chiropractic; · Broadway Brevities, October 1923 (full issue) · Will Straw, “Traffic in Scandal, the Story of Broadway Brevities,” University of Toronto Quarterly , Volume 73, Number 4, Fall 2004, pp. 947-971. · Will Straw, “ Remembering the Creator of Modern Gossip Journalism,” 8 February 2016 blog post, HuffPost Canada Online Archive. URL: https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/gossip-king-stephen-g-clow_b_9169414

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9810.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207