The Papers of George Augustus Robinson, Chief Protector, Port Philip Aboriginal Protectorate, Volume One : Chief Protector's Office Journal 1839 - 1850
Bibliographic record
Abstract
George Augustus Robinson arrived in Melbourne in late February 1839 to take up his position as Chief Protector in the Aboriginal Protectorate in the Port Phillip District of New South Wales. In late 1849, the government decided to abolish the Protectorate Department, and accordingly in March 1850 the department ceased to exist. Based in Melbourne, Robinson generally referred to his administrative quarters as 'Chief Protector's Office'. During the life of the Port Phillip Aboriginal Protectorate, at least six locations served as his central headquarters: a hut on the Police Magistrate's paddock in what is now Jolimont (1839); the former Government Mission Station at what is now the Royal Botanic Gardens (1839); the jury room of the old Supreme Court building (1843); a change of offices, possibly in the same building (1847); rooms rented from William Willoughby (1848); rooms rented from JB Were in Collins Street (1848); rooms rented from William Willoughby in Queen Street (1849). During Robinson's chief protectorship, at least eleven men served as his personal clerk. Their terms of employment ranged from one week to 27 months. They were as follows: William Lansdown (1839-40); Godwin (1840); Thomas Martin (1840-41); McGill (1841); Thomas Martic (1841-42); Frederick William Dallimore (1842); CA Wallinger (1842-43); H. McClure (1843-44); Henry Boorn Foot (1844-47); Charles Forrest (1847-48); Henry Lingham (1848-50). This volume publishes the Office Journal of the Chief Protector's Office, and with few exceptions, the entries were made by Robinson's personal clerks. Entries by all clerks, bar McGill and Dallimore, have survived, and are here published. Dr Ian D. Clark, was born and raised in Ararat in western Victoria, and has a doctorate in Aboriginal historical geography from Monash University. He has been the History Research Fellow at the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies; the Manager of the Brambuk Living Cultural Centre; and Senior Researcher in the Koorie Tourism Unit in the former Victorian Tourism Commission. [From back cover]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".