MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070295766

Occupational Solar Ultraviolet Radiation and Breast Cancer Risk

2022· dissertation· en· W7070295766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerPopulationRisk factors for breast cancerCancerDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has potential protective and confirmed detrimental effects on cancer risk. Several studies have examined recreational sun exposure in relation to breast cancer risk, and a recent meta-analysis found that moderate sun exposure (1 to <2 hours/day) was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. Only one previous study in Canada has investigated sun exposure and breast cancer risk in an occupational setting. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the relationship between occupational solar UVR and breast cancer risk in Canada.
\nMethods: A case-cohort study was conducted utilizing data from the Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow's Health (CanPath) prospective cohort study. Questionnaires were completed at baseline to obtain information on sun exposure, current and longest job held, and breast cancer risk factors. Cancer outcomes were ascertained via linkage with provincial cancer registries and administrative databases. Longest held job at baseline was linked to a job exposure matrix to assign exposure to occupational solar UVR. Breast cancer risk estimates (hazard ratios [HR]) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazard’s regression model with age as the timescale.
\nResults: A total of 1,822 breast cancer cases met eligibility criteria from the underlying cohort and a random sample of 7,361 female participants were selected for the subcohort. The prevalence of occupational exposure to solar UVR was 2.2% in the case-cohort. HRs (1.14 (95% CI 0.84-1.54)] do not suggest that occupational solar UVR has a protective or detrimental effect on the risk of breast cancer for Canadian females. When analyzed by menopausal status, the risk for pre-menopausal breast cancer was elevated, but not statistically significant (HR=1.66 [95% CI 0.93-.95]). Occupational solar UVR was not associated with the risk of breast cancer for post-menopausal Canadian females.
\nConclusion: Previous research has focused on recreational sun exposure. The present study is the second to examine the relationship between occupational sun exposure and breast cancer in Canada and suggests that occupational exposure to UVR, may increase breast cancer risk in pre-menopausal females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207